Tenders Are Invited For Road Renovation At The Osir Recreation Center At Ul. Belzacka 108/110 In Piotrków Trybunalski

1. The Subject Of The Order Is: Roof Renovation At The Osir Recreation Center At Ul. Belzacka 108/110 In Piotrków Trybunalski, Including In Particular The Following Types Of Construction Works: A) Construction Works, B) Roof Cover Works, C) Painting Works, D) Lightning Protection Installation, 2. In Detail The Subject Of The Order Was Described In Swz Part Ii And In Swz Part Iii.3. Cpv (Common Dictionary Of Orders):- 45000000-7 Construction Works- 45260000-7 Roofs In The Field Of Roofing And Roof Structures And Other Similar Specialist Works- 45310000-3 Electrical Installation Works- 45312310-3 Lightning Protection- 454442100-8 Painting Robots4. The Employer Does Not Provide For The Right To Exercise The Option. 5. The Contracting Authority Does Not Reserve The Obligation To Perform Key Tasks By The Contractor In Person. 6. The Contracting Authority In Accordance With Art. 95 Of The Public Procurement Law Requires Employment By The Contractor Or Subcontractor Under An Employment Contract Of Persons Performing Activities In The Scope Of The Contract, I.E. Robots Involving Covering The Roof With Thermosal Felt, Flashings, I.E. People Performing Activities Involving The Performance Of Work In The Manner Specified In Art. 22 §1 Of The Act Of 26 June 1974 - Labor Code. Informations Regarding The Verification And Rights Of The Contracting Authority Are Described In § 5 Of The Planned Provisions Of The Contract, Constituting Part Iii Swz.7. The Employer Does Not Reserve That Only Contractors With The Status Of A Protected Workplace, Social Cooperatives And Other Contractors Whose Main Purpose Or Main Purpose Of The Activities Of Their Organizationally Separated Units That Will Carry Out The Contract Is The Social And Professional Integration Of Socially Marginalized Persons, In Particular The Indicated In Art. 94 Para. 1 Point 1-10) Of The Pzp Act. 8. The Employer Does Not Provide: 1) The Contractor Has A Local Vision Of Lub2) Checking The Documents Necessary For The Performance Of The Order Available On Site At The Contracting Authority. 9. The Employer Does Not Provide For The Possibility Of Granting The Existing Contractor To The Order Service Referred To In Art. 214 Para. 1 Point 7 In Connection With Art. 305 Point 1) Of The Public Procurement Law 10. The Order Was Not Divided Into Parts (Thus The Contracting Authority Does Not Allow The Submission Of Partial Offers Referred To In Article 7 Point 15) Of The Pzp Act) Due To: The Implementation Of The Task By Various Contractors Would Result In Collisions That Are Impossible To Eliminate Or Prevent Proper Implementation Of Tasks. The Works Are Performed At The Same Time And Are Dependent On Each Other, Which Ensures Consistency Of Implementation. In The Case Of Division, The Duration Of The Works Would Be Irrationally Elongated, Which Would Affect The Increase In Renovation Costs.