Tenders Are Invited For Reconstruction Of Pzgik Rooms At Ul. Szkolna 28 In Piotrków Trybunalski

1 Internal Door Openings, Repairing Internal Walls, In Particular By Removing The Cracks Of The Walls And Refreshing The Painting Coatings In The Rooms Occupied By Modgik. Working Of Works: 1) Dismantling The Wall Cladding From Plates In Sanitary Rooms, 2) Demolishing Masonry Walls In Accordance With Drawing Documentation. 3) Dismantling Of Interior Doors And Removing From The Wall Frames, 4) Widening The Holes For The Installation Of New Frames, 5) Careful Dismantling Of Stone Wall Cladding (Travertine) With The Possibility Of Reusing, 6) Dismantling The Floor Covering From Pvc In Accordance With The Drawing Documentation, 7) Supplementing The Suspended Ceiling After Dismantling And Making A New Partition Wall, 8) The Faded Plaster Between The Wall And The Ceiling In Rooms On The First Floor, 9) Supplementing And Equalizing The Abovementioned Plasters, 10) Scraping And Washing The Surface Of The Walls And Ceilings, 11) Making Plaster Coats In Rooms On The First Floor, 12) Replacement And Change Of Interior Lighting Location In Part Of The Rooms, 13) Installation Of Air Conditioning In Rooms Located On The First Floor, 14) Replacement Of Existing Nests And Electrical Switches For New Ones, 15) Installation Of The System Of Calling In The Toilet, 16) Glaze And Terracotta In Sanitary Rooms, 17) Installation Of Wrapping Frames And New Interior Doors According To The Combination Of Joinery, 18) Painting Works, 19) Replacement Of White Assembly Devices In The Toilet, 20) Mirror Assembly; 2. The Subject Of The Contract Was Described In Detail In Swz Part Ii. Equivalent To The Following: In Accordance With Art. 101 Para. 4 Of The Public Procurement Law, If In The Project Documentation Or Stwior, A Reference To Standards, Technical Assessments, Approval, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference Systems Referred To In Art. 101 Para. 1 Point 2 And Para. 3 Of The Public Procurement Law, And Such References Were Not Accompanied By The Expression Or Equivalent, The Contracting Authority Allows Equivalent Solutions Described In Each Standard, Technical Assessment, Approval, Technical Specification, Technical Reference System. 3. The Contracting Authority Does Not Reserve The Obligation To Perform Key Tasks By The Contractor In Person. 4. The Order Was Not Divided Into Parts Due To: 1) The Implementation Of The Task By Various Contractors Would Result In Collisions That Are Impossible To Eliminate Or Prevent The Proper Implementation Of Tasks. The Works Are Performed At The Same Time And Are Dependent On Each Other, Which Ensures Consistency Of Implementation. In The Event Of Division, The Time Of Execution Of Works Would Be Irrationally Elongated, Which Would Affect The Increase In Investment Costs. 2) This Order Is One Investment Intention, Located In A Specific Area, Therefore, Having Regard To The Technology Of Organizing Works, The Inability To Separate Separate Construction Sites, In The Assessment Of The Contracting Authority He Would Be An Indiv