Tenders Are Invited For Purchase Of Teaching Aids As Part Of The Task Entitled Others And The Same Equal - Education In The Szamotuły Commune

The Scope Of The Subject Of The Contract Includes: Part 1. Primary School No. 1 In Szamotuły, Ul. Staszica 1, 64-500 Szamotuły: 1. Retrofitting The Room For Specialist Classes; 2. Retrofitting The Worlds Experience; 3. Retrofitting The Room For Specialist Classes (Si Cab); 4. Purchase Of Equipment / Teaching Aids To Conduct Specialist Classes; 5. Purchase Of The Multimedia Planch Program; 6. Purchase Of A Device For Diagnosis And Therapy Of Auditory Attention By Tomatis.A. The Subject Of The Contract Is The Delivery And Assembly In The Field Of Didactic Equipment For 6 Facilities Under This Project; B. The Equipment Must Be Factory New, Unused, Undamaged, Not Covered By The Rights Of Third Parties, High Quality. It Is Required To Ensure A Minimum Of 24 -Month Warranty Period For All Didactic Aids, Listed In The Subject Of The Order With The Door To Door Option (All Service Costs Will Be Covered By The Contractor), With The Time Of Removing The Defect By The Service Specified At A Maximum Of 10 Business Days From The Moment Of Reporting The Fault. Equivalence: 1. Trademarks, Own Names, Etc. Indicated In The Documents - Are Only A Quality, Functional, Technical And Technological Pattern Regarding The Subject Of The Contract. In All Cases, In Which, Due To The Specification Of The Subject Of The Contract, The Origin, Names Of Materials, Devices, Or Their Origin Were Indicated, The Use Of Materials, Equivalent Devices, I.E. All Materials Listed From The Name, Devices Used In The Documentation Provided By The Contracting Authority Or Their Origin, Serve Only To Determine The Standard And Can Be Replaced By Other Technical, Functional, Functional, And Quality, Quality, Aesthetic Values, Taking Into Account The Proper Cooperation With Other Materials And Devices. The Names Used In The Order Documentation, Which Indicate Or Could Be Associated With The Manufacturer Or Company, Are Not Intended To Prefer The Solutions Of A Given Manufacturer, But To Indicate A Solution That Should Have Technical, Technological Features No Worse Than Those Given In The Technical Documentation. The Contracting Authority In The Case Of Offers Containing Equivalent Solutions Will Be Verified In Terms Of Meeting The Requirements Of Individual Items Of Technical Requirements Contained In The Attachments To The Specification. The Contractor Is Obliged To Prove The Equivalence Of The Offered Devices Or Systems In The Offer. The Burden Of Proving Equivalence Is The Contractors Responsibility. The Employer Will Not Recognize Equivalent Solutions If They Are Worse Than Those Indicated In The Attachments To The Minimum Quality Specification Of Qualitative, Functional, Technical And Technological Requirements. 2. The Listed Names Of The Manufacturers (If They Appear) Were Used Only For Example. Possibly The Indicated Names Of The Products And Their Manufacturers Are Not Aimed At Violating The Principle Of Fair Competition And Equal Treatment Of Contractors. Wherever They Are Indicated