Solar Photovoltaic Modules - Construction Of A Solar Farm In Siemianowice Śląskie I.. 1. The Subject Of The Contract Is The Supply Of Photovoltaic Installations, Hereinafter Referred To As The Solar Farm, With A Capacity Of Up To 1 Mw Together With The Launch And Obtaining Formal And Legal Documentation, Required By The Applicable Regulations, Necessary To Start And Operate The Installation. The Photovoltaic Farm In Question Will Be Built In The Area Of Ul. Henryk Krupanka And Zachodna And Will Be The Implementation Of The Task Entitled: Construction Of A Photovoltaic Farm In Siemianowice Śląskie I. 2. The Task Is Implemented As Part Of The European Funds For Silesia 2021-2027 Priority: Fesl.10.00-European Funds For Transformation For The Action: Fesl.10.06-District Distributed Energy Based On Renewable Energy Sources. 3. A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Is: A) Functional And Utility Program (Add-On No. 3 To Swz), B) Planned Provisions Of The Contract (Addition No. 4 To Swz). 4. For The Subject Of The Contract, The Selected Contractor Will Grant The Contracting Authority A Guarantee And Warranty: A) To Photovoltaic Panels For A Period In Accordance With The Contractors Offer, But Not Less Than 60 Months; B) On The Linear Output Power Of Photovoltaic Panels, I.E. Not Less Than 84% Of Initial Efficiency After 25 Years Of Use, Warranty And Warranty For A Period Of 25 Years; C) For A Inverter For A Period Consistent With The Contractors Offer, However, Not Less Than 60 Months; D) For The Remaining Scope Of The Subject Of The Contract For The Period In Accordance With The Contractors Offer, But Not Shorter Than For A Period Of 72 Months; Counting From The Day After The Day Of Signing The Final Acceptance Report By The Ordering Party And The Contractor. 5. The Contracting Authority Described The Subject Of The Order Without Indicating Trademarks, Patents Or Origin, Source Or Special Process That Characterizes The Product Or Services Provided By A Specific Contractor. If The Contractor Finds That The Subject Of The Contract Was Described In The Manner Referred To In Art. 99 Paragraph 5 Of The Act, I.E. The Origin (Brand, Trademark, Manufacturer, Supplier) Of The Materials Was Indicated, And The Criteria Used To Assess Equivalence Were Not Given, He Should Ask The Employer To Indicate What Criteria Will Be Used To Assess Equivalence. 6. If The Documentation Constituting A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Includes References To Standards, Technical Assessments, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference Systems Referred To In Art. 101 Para. 1 Point 2 And Para. 3 Of The Pzp Act, The Contracting Authority Allows Equivalent Solutions Described. The Use Of A Given Standard, Technical Assessment, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference System In The Documentation Is Only 7. 100 Para. 1 Pzp. 8. The Contracting Authority In The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Did Not Specify The Requirements For The Performance Or Functionality Referred To In Art. 101 Para. 1 Point 1 Of The Pzp. 9. The Contracting Authority Does Not Demand The Label From The Contractor And N
We takes all possible care for accurate & authentic tender information, however Users are requested to refer Original source of Tender Notice / Tender Document published by Tender Issuing Agency before taking any call regarding this tender.
