Tenders Are Invited For A Comprehensive Service Related To The Implementation Of A Studio Trip To Rhineland-Palatinate/Germany And The Grand Duchy Of Luxembourg For The Agri-Food And Gastronomic-Hotel Industry

1. The Subject Of The Contract Is A Comprehensive Service Related To The Implementation Of A Studio Trip To Rhineland-Palatinate/Germany And The Grand Duchy Of Luxembourg For The Agri-Food And Gastronomic-Hotel Industry. 2. A Detailed Description And Manner Of The Contract Is Designed For The Subject Of The Contract Constituting Annex 1A To Swz.3. The Contracting Authority Does Not Divide The Order Into Parts And Thus Does Not Allow Partial Offers. 4. Reasons For Failure To Divide The Order Into Parts: After Analyzing The Subject Of The Contract And The Terms Of Its Implementation, It Was Established That It Was Not Reasonable To Divide The Contract In Question Into Parts. The Division Of The Order Would Be Inefficient Because It Would Lead To An Increase In Order Costs, Technical Difficulties And Problems In Coordinating The Activities Of Various Contractors Implementing Individual Parts Of The Order, Which In Effect Could Threaten The Proper Implementation Of The Contract In Question. The Realization Of The Subject Of The Contract In Full By One Contractor Is Rational And Justified For Organizational And Economic Reasons. The Lack Of Division Of The Said Order Into Parts Does Not Violate The Competition And Does Not Limit The Possibility Of Applying For The Order To Smaller Entities, In Particular Small And Medium Enterprises. In Addition, The Order, The Subject Of Which Are Studio Trips And Comprehensive Tourist Services, Is Granted By The Contracting Authority In Parts, And Each Of These Parts Is The Subject Of Separate Proceedings. Ordinary Procedures For Each Part Are Initiated And Implemented In Separate Proceedings And At Various Dates Specified In The Public Procurement Proceedings Plan For 2025. The Said Order Is A Separate Part In The Plan Of Public Procurement Proceedings For 2025. Bearing In Mind The Above, The Decision That The Contract In Question Is Completed By One Contractor Is Fully Justified, And The Division Of The Contract On Parts Would Be Unfounded That May Lead To The Irrational Spending Of Public Funds. 5. Employment Requirements Based On An Employment Relationship: The Contracting Authority Does Not Require Employment By The Contractor Or Subcontractor On The Basis Of An Employment Relationship Of Persons Performing Activities In The Scope Of The Contract Because The Implementation Of The Subject Of The Contract Is Not About Performing Work In The Manner Specified In Art. 22 § 1 Of The Act Of 26 June 1974 - Labor Code (Journal Of Laws Of 2025, Item 277, As Amended), Hereinafter Referred To As The Labor Code. Pursuant To Art. 22 § 1 Of The Labor Code By Establishing An Employment Relationship, The Employee Undertakes To Perform A Specific Type Of Work For The Employer And Under His Leadership And At The Place And Time Appointed By The Employer, And The Employer - To Employ An Employee For Remuneration. 95 Of The Pzp Act, The Employer Specifies In The Contract Notice Or Contract Documents For Services Or Construction Work

Refer document

FileName	File Description
Global Tender Document	099f49f4-e61c-4578-83a4-3bca766ba4eb.html