Tenders Are Invited For Reconstruction Of Ul. Wiejska In Odrowąż

The Subject Of The Order Is The Reconstruction Of Ul. Wiejska In Odrowąż. As Part Of The Order, It Is Planned To Perform In Particular: Accurate Milling Of Existing Surface, Bilateral Road Resistors 12*25 (In Places Where There Is No Pavement), Replacement Of The Existing Curb (At The Sidewalk), Replacement Of The Pavement Surface, Exit To The Concrete Cube Property, Reconstruction Of Hardened Conventions In Reference To The Designed Surface, A New Layer Package Bituminous Roads, Roadside From Broken Aggregate, Target Marking, Ordering The Adjacent Area. The Concise Description Of The Subject Of The Contract And The Scope Of Works Is Determined By The Design Documentation, The Bill Of Quantities And The Technical Specification Of The Performance And Acceptance Of Construction Works (Stwiorb), Which Constitute Attachments To This Swz. Materials Should Be Understood As Determining The Required Technical Parameters Or Quality Standards. This Means That In The Case Of The Materials (Products) Indicated By The Name, The Employer Allows The Use Of Equivalent Materials, Not Of Inferior Quality Than Those Described In The Design Documentation. The Concept Of Equivalent Materials And Devices Should Be Understood As Materials Guaranteeing The Implementation Of Works In Accordance With The Project And Ensuring Obtaining Technical Parameters Not Worse Than Those Founded In The Project Documentation, Technical Specification Of The Performance And Acceptance Of Works And A Predecession Of Works. Equivalent Products And Devices Must Be Allowed To Trading And Use In Accordance With Applicable Law. The Conclusion Indicates That The Obligation To Submit Solutions Equivalent In Relation To The Subject Of The Contract Described In The Description And Demonstration Of Equivalence Lies With The Contractor. The Lack Of Division Of The Order Into Parts: Division Of The Order Into Parts Is Unprecedented. This Division Of The Order Into Parts Would Threaten Excessive Technical Difficulties And Excessive Costs Of Performing The Contract. Coordinating The Activities Of Various Contractors Carrying Out Individual Parts Of The Order Could Seriously Threaten The Proper Performance Of The Order. Another Important Reason For The Failure To Divide The Order Into Parts Is That The Contracting Authority Obtained A Guarantee Of Quality For The Entire Order, After Dividing Into Parts, There Would Be Problems With Obtaining Such A Guarantee And Excessive Fragmentation Of Liability Among Various Contractors Would Occur And Would Cause A Threat Against The Background Of Pursuing Claims Under Warranty Or Warranty. Due To The Scope Of Work To Perform, Which Are Closely Related And Dependent, The Division Into Parts Could Cause Problems With The Term Of The Implementation Of Individual Parts And The Entire Order. Micro -Enterprises, Small And Medium -Sized Enterprises Can Freely Apply For An Order, Subcontracting Is Also Allowed, So There Is Absolutely No Violation Of Competition By Limiti