Tenders Are Invited For Construction Of A Graduation Tower In The Bytkowski Laszek

The Subject Of The Investment Is The Implementation Of The Task Entitled: Construction Of A Graduation Tower In The Bytkowski Laszek. 1.2. As Part Of The Investment, The Following Will Be Made: A) Tidying Up The Area Intended For The Graduation Tower And The Area Around; B) Removal Of Colliding Low And High Vegetation, Including Trees, Shrubs, Etc., Not Requiring A Permit To Cut Trees Or Shrubs; C) Construction Of A Brine Graduation Tower Along With The Necessary Technical Equipment; D) Assembly Of The Graduation Of The Graduation Tower; E) Assembly Of Elements Of Small Architecture (Benches, Garbage Bin, Bicycle Stand, Information Board); F) Hardening Of The Terrain And Performing Access To The Graduation Tower From The Pavement Surrounding Laski Bytkowski; 1.3. A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Is: A) Design Documentation (Add -On No. 3 To Swz), B) Technical Specifications For The Execution And Acceptance Of Construction Works (Add -On No. 4 To Swz) C) Designed Contractual Provisions (Addition No. 5 To Swz), - Hereinafter Referred To As Documentation. 1.4. For The Subject Of The Contract, The Selected Contractor Will Grant The Contracting Authority A Guarantee And Warranty For A Period In Accordance With The Contractors Offer, But Not Less Than 60 Months From The Day Of The Day After The Day Of The Protocol Collection Without Reservations Of The Entire Subject Of The Contract. 1.5. The Contracting Authority Described The Subject Of The Order Without Indicating Trademarks, Patents Or Origin, Source Or Special Process That Characterizes The Product Or Services Provided By A Specific Contractor. If The Contractor Finds That The Subject Of The Contract Was Described In The Manner Referred To In Art. 99 Para. 5 Of The Act, I.E. The Origin (Brand, Trademark, Manufacturer, Supplier) Of The Materials Was Indicated, And The Criteria Used To Assess The Equivalence Were Not Given, He Should Ask The Employer To Indicate What Criteria Will Be Used To Assess Equivalence. 1.6. If The Documentation Constituting A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Includes References To Standards, Technical Assessments, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference Systems Referred To In Art. 101 Para. 1 Point 2 And Para. 3 Of The Pzp Act, The Contracting Authority Allows Equivalent Solutions Described. The Use Of A Given Standard In The Documentation, Technical Assessment, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference System Is Only Intended To Clarify The Level Of Expectations Of The Employer In Relation To A Specific Material/Device/Product. 1.7. The Contracting Authority In The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Took Into Account The Requirements For Availability For Disabled People And Design For All Users Referred To Art. 100 Para. 1 Pzp.1.8. The Contracting Authority In The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Did Not Specify The Requirements For The Efficiency Or Functionality Referred To In Art. 101 Para. 1 Poin