Tenders Are Invited For Retrofitting The Department Of Anesthesiology And Intensive Care Of The Provincial Hospital. Dr. Ludwik Rydygiera In Suwałki With A Monitor For Measuring Hemodynamics.

1 The Subject Of The Order Is: Retrofitting The Department Of Anesthesiology And Intensive Care Of The Provincial Hospital. Dr. Ludwika Rydygiera In Suwałki With A Monitor For Measuring Hemodynamics, With The Parameters Specified In Annex 4 To Swz.2 All Offered Products Must Be Placed On The Market And Used In Accordance With The Provisions Of The Act Of April 7, 2022. On Medical Devices (Journal Of Laws Of 2022, Item 974, Consolidated Text)3 If The Description Of The Subject Of The Order Indicates Any Trademark, Patent Or Origin, Source Or Specific Process That Characterizes The Products Or Services Provided By A Specific Contractor - It Should Be Assumed That That The Ordering Party Provided Such A Description In Order To Determine The Minimum Parameters That The Products Must Meet In Order To Meet The Requirements Set By The Ordering Party And That They Constitute Only A Quality Standard Of The Subject Of The Order, And Not An Indication Of A Specific Product Of A Given Manufacturer. Pursuant To Art. 101 Section 4 Of The Public Procurement Law. The Ordering Party Allows The Possibility Of Submitting An Equivalent Offer, Provided, However, That The Equivalent Product Proposed By The Contractor Will Meet The Minimum Requirements Of The Same Class Expected By The Ordering Party, I.E. It Will Meet The Requirements Described By The Ordering Party In The Swz. The Assortment Proposed As Equivalent Cannot Differ In Quality, Standard Or Technical Parameters From Those Assumed By The Ordering Party. The Ordering Party Will Consider The Product To Be Equivalent If It Has The Same Or Better Technical And Quality Parameters Than Those Described In The Swz, And Its Use Will In No Way Affect The Proper Functioning Of The Device In Accordance With Its Intended Purpose. A Contractor Who Relies On Equivalent Solutions Is Obliged To Demonstrate That The Supplies He Offers Meet The Requirements Specified By The Ordering Party (Article 101(5) Of The Public Procurement Law). The Burden Of Proof To Prove The Equivalence Of The Offered Solutions With The Solutions Described By Indicating An Example Trademark, Patent Or Origin Rests With The Contractor Submitting An Equivalent Offer.