Tenders Are Invited For Construction Of A Sanitary Sewage System Along With The Construction Of A Sewage Treatment Plant In The Town Of Droszków In The Zabór Commune

1. The Subject Of The Order Is The Construction Of A Sewage Treatment Plant In The Droszków Commune For The Droszków, Przytok And Łaz Commune In The Zabór Commune, Zielona Góra Poviat, Lubusz Voivodeship. The Construction Of The Sewage Treatment Plant Will Be Accompanied By The Construction Of External Sanitary Sewage, Water And Electricity Networks Along With The Discharge Of Treated Sewage, Surface Consolidation With Grit And Asphalt Emulsion Of The Existing Aggregate Road Leading To The Sewage Treatment Plant, And Construction Of An Electricity Connection With A Transformer Station Based On The Documentation Attached To The Swz Design Along With The Bill Of Quantities.2. The Detailed Scope Of The Subject Of The Order Is Specified In The Design Documentation, Which Constitutes An Integral Part Of The Specification Of The Terms Of The Order (Annex No. 4 To The Swz) And The Bill Of Quantities - Annex No. 5. The Bill Of Quantities Is Attached Only As An Aid. 3. The Implementation Of The Subject Of The Contract Will Be Carried Out With The Use Of Funds From The Government Fund Polish Order: Strategic Investment Program Edition 8/2023/616/Polskilad.4. The Contractor Will Carry Out The Works Using New Materials And Own Equipment, Which He Will Purchase And Deliver To The Construction Site At His Own Expense And Risk. The Cost Of Purchase And Delivery Of All Materials And Equipment Used To Complete The Subject Of The Order Is Included In The Contractors Remuneration. The Materials And Devices Used During The Execution Of The Works Must Be Approved For Use In Construction, In Accordance With The Applicable Legal Regulations. Demolition Materials Are The Property Of The Ordering Party. 5. As Part Of The Implementation Of The Subject Of The Order, The Works Must Be Carried Out Taking Into Account The Requirements Arising From The Act Of July 19, 2019 On Ensuring Accessibility For Persons With Special Needs (Journal Of Laws Of 2022, Item 2240), In Particular In The Field Of Liquidation Architectural Barriers. 6. The Subject Matter Of The Contract, To The Extent That It Is Described By Indication Of Trademarks, Patents Or The Origin, Source Or Specific Process That Characterizes The Product Or Services Provided By A Particular Economic Operator, Should Be Read Together With The Words Or Equivalent. Therefore, It Is Allowed To Use Materials And Devices Other Than Those Indicated By The Manufacturers Names And Symbols, Provided That They Are Characterized By Equivalent, I.E. Not Worse, Parameters Important From The Point Of View Of The Use Of These Materials, And It Is The Contractors Obligation To Demonstrate The Equivalence Of These Parameters . 7. If The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Includes References To Standards, Technical Assessments, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference Systems Referred To In Art. 101 Section 1 Point 2 And Section 3 Of The Public Procurement Law, The Ordering Party Allows Solutions Equivalent To Those Described. 8. The Information On Parameters And Functions Contained In This Swz Together With The Annexes Is The Minimum Data - The Ordering Party Allows The Offer Of Products With Extended Functions And Better Parameters, Provided That They Meet The Minimum Requirements Specified In This Order. 9. The Ordering Party Reserves The Right To Agree And Approve Material Solutions At Every Stage Of Order Execution.10. All Other Parameters Regarding The Scope Of Construction Works Covered By The Order Are Specified In The Design Documentation And Bill Of Quantities.11. The Contractor Is Obliged, Throughout The Entire Period Of Implementation Of The Subject Of The Order, To Employ Persons Performing Activities Related To The Implementation Of The Subject Of The Order, I.E. Direct Performance Of Construction Works In All Industries - All Manual Workers Performing Construction Works On The Construction Site, Technical Construction Staff, With The Exception Of The Construction Manager, Manager Works Only On The Basis Of Employment Contracts Within The Meaning Of The Provisions Of The Act Of June 26, 1974, Labor Code (Journal Of Laws Of 2023, Item 1465). 12. When Performing The Subject Of The Order, The Contractor Is Obliged To Respect The Law, In Particular The Provisions Of The Act Of July 7, 1994, Construction Law - (Journal Of Laws Of 2024, Item 725), And The Provisions Of This Specification Of Terms Of Order (Swz). ).13. The Ordering Party Does Not Allow The Submission Of Variant And/Or Partial Offers.14. Reasons For Not Dividing The Contract Into Lots: All Works Covered By The Subject Of The Contract Constitute Closely Related Elements Of The Contract. Moreover, In Accordance With Recital 78 Of The Preamble To Directive 2014/24/Eu Of The European Parliament And Of The Council Of 26/02/2014 (Hereinafter Referred To As The Directive), Public Procurement Should Be Adapted To The Needs Of Smes. The Directive States That Member States Should Encourage Contracting Authorities To Share Large Orders For Parts. In Accordance With The Above-Mentioned Directive, The Ordering Party May Divide The Order On A Quantitative Basis - So That The Size Of Individual Orders Better Corresponds To The Capabilities Of Smes, Or On A Qualitative Basis, Taking Into Account The Various Industries And Specializations Involved, So As To Better Adapt The Content Of Individual Orders To Specialized Sme Sectors. The Directive Further States That The Contracting Authority Should Be Obliged To Consider The Advisability Of Dividing Contracts Into Lots, While Retaining The Freedom To Make Autonomous Decisions On Any Basis It Deems Appropriate, Without Being Subject To Administrative Or Judicial Supervision As A Reason For Not Dividing The Contract Into Lots The Directive Provides, For Example, The Following Circumstances: The Contracting Authority Could Find That Such A Division Would Pose A Risk Of Restricting Competition Or Excessive Costs Of Performing The Contract, Or The Need To Coordinate The Activities Of Different Contractors Performing Individual Parts Of The Contract Could Seriously Jeopardize The Proper Performance Of The Contract. The Estimated Value Of This Contract Is Lower Than The Eu Thresholds Referred To In Art. 3 Of The Public Procurement Law. Taking This Into Account, It Should Be Stated That This Procedure Does Not Fall Into The Category Of Large Contracts. Therefore, By Its Nature, It Is Addressed To Smes, I.E. The Basic Assumption Of The Directive That The Contract Should Be Adapted To The Needs Of Smes Is Met. Moreover, Due To The Specificity Of The Subject Of The Contract, Dividing The Contract Into Parts Would Be Irrational Because It Could Cause Excessive Technical Difficulties And The Need To Coordinate The Activities Of Various Contractors Implementing Individual Parts Of The Order In Terms Of The Order Completion Date, Readiness For Receipt, Issuance And Payment Of Invoices, Which Could Lead To Incorrect Execution Of The Order. The Ordering Party Did Not Divide The Order Into Parts Also Due To Excessive Costs - Work Performed By Different Contractors, Which Would Pose A Risk Of Doubling Indirect Costs Affecting The Price Of E.G. Materials And Securing The Work After Partial Completion By A Given Contractor. The Need To Coordinate The Activities Of Various Contractors Implementing Individual Parts Of The Order Could Seriously Jeopardize The Proper And Timely Execution Of The Order. Not Dividing The Order Into Parts Does Not Limit Competitiveness. 15. The Ordering Party Does Not Provide For The Possibility Of Awarding Single-Source Contracts Referred To In Art. 214 Section 1 Point 7 And 8 Of The Act. 16. The Ordering Party Will Not Select The Most Advantageous Offer Using An Electronic Auction.17. The Ordering Party Does Not Require Submitting An Offer In The Form Of Electronic Catalogs Or Attaching Electronic Catalogues.