Tenders Are Invited For Lease Of Printing Devices With The Implementation Of The Central Printing System At The City Hall Of Siemianowice l skie

1. The Subject Of The Order Is The Lease And Maintenance For The Entire Duration Of The Contract Of 52 Multifunction Devices, Including: 21 Monochrome Devices Supporting The A4 Format Without A Base, 18 Monochrome Devices Supporting The A4 Format With A Base And 13 Color Devices Supporting The A3 Format. In Addition, The Subject Of The Order Includes The Supply Of Licenses, Implementation And Maintenance Of The Central Printing System Throughout The Duration Of The Contract. 2. A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Order Is Included In Appendix No. 3 To The Swz And In The Draft Provisions Of The Contract (Appendix No. 4 To The Swz). 3. The Contractor Is Obliged To Complete The Order On The Terms And Conditions Described In The Draft Provisions Of The Contract (Appendix No. 4 To The Swz). 4. In Order To Confirm That The Offered Subject Of The Order Meets The Requirements Of The Ordering Party Specified In The Swz, The Contractor Applying For The Contract Is Obliged To Submit With The Offer Description Of The Offered Devices And The Central Printing System According To Appendix No. 6 To The Swz. 5. The Ordering Party Described The Subject Of The Order Without Mentioning The Trademarks, Patents Or Origin Of The Source, Or The Specific Process That Characterizes The Product Or Services Provided By A Particular Contractor. If The Contractor Finds That The Subject Of The Contract Has Been Described In The Manner Referred To In Art. 99 Section 5 Of The Act, I.E.: The Origin (Brand, Trademark, Manufacturer, Supplier) Of The Materials Has Been Indicated And The Criteria Used To Assess Equivalence Have Not Been Provided, Should Ask The Ordering Party To Indicate What Criteria Will Be Used To Assess Equivalence.6. If The Documents Described Above Contain References To Standards, Technical Assessments, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference Systems Referred To In Art. 101, Section 1, Point 2 And Section 3 Of The Public Procurement Law, The Ordering Party Allows Equivalent Solutions. The Use Of A Given Standard, Technical Assessment, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference System In The Documents Is Only Intended To Clarify The Level Of The Ordering Partys Expectations In Relation To A Specific Material Or Device Or Product.6. In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order, The Ordering Party Took Into Account The Requirements Regarding Accessibility For Disabled People And Design For All Users Referred To In Art. 100 Paragraph 1 Pzp.7. In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order, The Ordering Party Did Not Specify The Performance Or Functionality Requirements Referred To In Art. 101 Section 1 Point 1 Pzp.8. The Ordering Party Does Not Require A Label From The Contractor And Does Not Indicate The Applicable Requirements Of A Specific Label, Referred To In Art. 104 Of The Public Procurement Law. 9. The Ordering Party Does Not Reserve The Right To Apply For The Contract Only By Contractors Referred To In Art. 94 Of The Public Procurement Law, I.E. Those Having The Status Of A Sheltered Workshop, Social Cooperatives And Other Contractors Whose Main Goal Or Main Purpose Of The Activities Of Their Organizationally Separated Units That Will Implement The Order Is The Social And Professional Integration Of Socially Marginalized People.

Refer document

FileName	File Description
Global Tender Document	Tender Notice