Tenders are invited for Exercising Investors Supervision For The Task Mon. Reconstruction Of A Section Of Rzepakowa Street In Leszno

1. The Subject Of The Contract Is The Investors Supervision For The Task Entitled Reconstruction Of A Section Of Rzepakowa Street In Leszno2. Designation Of The Subject Of The Contract According To The Common Cpv Procurement Dictionary: - Cpv: 71520000-9 Construction Supervision Services, - Cpv: 71540000-5 Construction Management Services, - Cpv: 71521000-6 Construction Site Supervision Services. 3. Description Of The Investment Task: The Subject Of The Order Includes The Reconstruction Of Ul. Rzepakowa In Leszno On The Section From Plots No. 536/2 And 535/9 With A Length Of 143.25 M, The Scope Of Which Includes In Particular: - Construction Of A Roadbed For Structural Layers, - Construction Of A New Surface Structure, - Construction Of A New Road Surface And Sidewalks - Construction Of A Rainwater Drainage System, - Assembly Of Wells And Inlets. Note! The Deadline For Completing Construction Works By The Contractor Is 5 Months From The Date Of Handing Over The Construction Site. Purchase Of The Construction Site: No Later Than 14 Days From The Date Of Signing The Contract For Construction Works Final Acceptance Of Works Within 7 Calendar Days From The Date Of Completion Of Construction Works. , Technical Specifications For The Execution And Acceptance Of Construction Works - Stwiorb And In The Illustrative Offer Cost Estimate For The Works. The Listed Documents Are Appendices To The Swz (Appendix No. 8 To The Swz For Construction Works) And Are Posted Together With It On The Website Https://Platformazakupowa.Pl/Pn/Um_Leszno 3. Other Requirements Regarding The Subject Of The Contract: 1) The Contractor Is Obliged To Provide As Part Of The Offered Contract Price, To Perform The Duties Of Supervision Inspectors, Persons With The Powers Required By The Construction Law To Supervise The Works. 2) If The Contractor Deems It Necessary Or Appropriate To Provide Additional Persons, He Should Do So. The Contractor Should Provide Its Supervision Inspectors And Specialists With The Necessary Support And Technical Assistance From Other Supervision Inspectors And Specialists, Which May Be Necessary For The Proper Performance Of The Subject Of The Contract, E.G. , As A Person Performing Independent Technical Functions, Will Be Responsible For Performing These Functions In Accordance With The Regulations And Principles Of Technical Knowledge With Due Diligence In The Performance Of Work And For The Proper Organization Of Work, Its Safety And Quality. Within The Framework Of The Project Should Be: True, Truthful And Full. 5) The Basic Duties Of The Investors Supervision Inspectors During The Performance Of The Contract, As Part Of The Subject Of The Contract, Will Include Representing And Performing The Duties Assigned To The Employer And Cooperation With Him During The Performance Of The Contract For Construction Works, In Particular Performing The Activities Referred To In The Contract Template ( Appendix 7 To The Swz).4. Documents Regarding The Subject Of The Contract Can Be Downloaded From The Website Https://Platformazakupowa.Pl/Pn/Um_Leszno 5. The Documents Being The Basis For The Implementation Of The Public Contract In Question Should Be Treated As Mutually Explanatory, In The Order Listed Below, For The Purpose Of Interpreting The Validity Of The Provisions: 1) Agreements With Attachments, Swz And Contractors Offers, 2) Designs, 3) Stwiorb, 4) Applicable Technical Regulations, Technical Knowledge And Standards Applicable In A Given Scope. 5) Bill Of Quantities6. Additional Requirements: 1) The Supervision Inspector Undertakes To Have A Civil Liability Insurance For The Entire Period Of Implementation Of This Agreement In The Scope Of Activities Related To The Subject Of The Contract, With The Sum Insured May Not Be Lower Than The Gross Value Of The Offer. Insurance Policy Along With Confirmation Of Payment Of Due Premiums At Any Stage Of The Term Of This Contract.3) The Contractor With Whom The Contract Will Be Concluded As A Result Of The Proceedings In Question Will Provide The Employer With A Guarantee And Warranty For Defects For A Period Of 60 Months.7. Pursuant To The Provision Of Art. 68 Sec. 3 Of The Act Of January 11, 2018 On Electromobility And Alternative Fuels (I.E. Journal Of Laws Of 2021, Item 110, As Amended), The Employer Requires That - In The Event Of Performance Of The Subject Of The Contract With The Use Of Motor Vehicles Within The Meaning Of Art. Article 2 Point 33 Of The Act Of 20 June 1997 Road Traffic Law (I.E. Journal Of Laws 2021, Item 450, As Amended) - The Total Share Of Electric Vehicles Or Vehicles Powered By Natural Gas In The Fleet Of Motor Vehicles Used To Perform This Task Was At Least 10%. The Contractor Is Obliged To Attach To The Offer A Statement Regarding The Use Of Electric Vehicles Or Vehicles Powered By Natural Gas In The Fleet Of Motor Vehicles Used In The Performance Of This Task (Appendix No. 8 To The Swz).8. This Contract Has Not Been Divided Into Lots, As This Contract Is Entirely A Service Of One Type. It Is A Contract Whose Failure To Divide It Into Lots Does Not Hinder Access To The Contract For Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises (Smes). Small Contractors Operating Even On The Local Market Will Certainly Have Access To This Contract. Fragmentation Of Such An Order Into Smaller Parts Would Be Pointless And Could Even Cause Unfavorable Consequences For The Ordering Party In The Form Of, For Example, Increasing The Prices Offered, Or Impossibility Of Settling The Procedure Due To The Lack Of Offers. The Specificity Of This Contract, Consisting In The Provision Of Investor Supervision Services, Makes It Difficult To Divide This Contract Into Parts. Dividing The Services Into Lots Would Entail Significant Problems During The Execution Of The Contract. In The Opinion Of The Employer, In This Particular Case, The Performance Of Individual Parts Of The Contract By Different Contractors Could Seriously Jeopardize The Proper Performance Of The Task. Dividing This Order Into Parts Would Entail Significant Technical Difficulties On The Part Of The Ordering Party Related To The Coordination Of The Results Of The Work Of Individual Contractors And Would Be Contrary To The Needs Of The Ordering Party Itself. Considering The Above Circumstances, The Employer Did Not Divide The Contract In Question Into Parts.