Tenders Are Invited For Reconstruction And Change Of Use Of Utility Rooms Into A Village Community Center As Part Of The Operation: Creation Of A Meeting Place For Residents Of The Wilków Commune In The Area Of ​​The Local Group........

1. The Subject Of The Order Is The Execution Of Construction Works Within The Meaning Of The Act Of July 7, 1994 - Construction Law As Part Of The Task Reconstruction With Change Of Use Of Utility Rooms Into A Village Community Center As Part Of The Operation: Creation Of A Meeting Place For The Inhabitants Of The Wilków Commune In The Area Of The Dobra Widawa Local Action Group For The Implementation Of This Task, The Ordering Party Received Funding Under The Intervention I.13.1 Leader/Community-Led Local Development (Clld) – Lsr Implementation Component. The Scope Of Reconstruction Works Includes In Particular: - Internal Construction And Assembly Works - Construction Of External Stairs - Construction Of Sanitary Installations - Construction Of Electrical Installations. A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Order Is Attached As Annex No. 3 To Swz.2.Codes And Names According To The Common Procurement Vocabulary (Cpv): Main Cpv Code: 45000000-7 Construction Works Additional Codes (Cpv): 45214200-2 Construction Works In The Field Of Construction Of Buildings Related To Education 45214210-5 Construction Works In The Field Of Primary Schools 45330000-9 Water, Sewage And Sanitary Installation Works 45310000-3 Electrical Installation Work 45410000-4 Plastering 45431000-7 Tiling 45421100-5 Installation Of Doors, Windows And Similar Items 45442100-8 Painting Work3.The Contractor Is Obliged To Complete The Order On The Terms And Conditions Described In The Swz Together With Annexes And The Offer.4.The Ordering Party Does Not Divide The Order Into Parts. The Value Of The Order Is Lower Than The So-Called Eu Thresholds That Oblige To Implement Eu Directives. Directive 2014/24/Eu States In Recital 78 That, In Order To Increase Competition, Contracting Authorities Should In Particular Be Encouraged To Divide Large Contracts Into Lots. The Contract In Question Is Not A Large Contract Within The Meaning Of Recital 78 Of The Above-Mentioned Eu Directive (The Directives Apply From The So-Called Eu Thresholds, And The Directive Uses The Concept Of A Large Contract In The Context Of Contracts Subject To The Directive, I.E. A Contract With A Value Significantly Exceeding The So-Called Eu Thresholds). Taking Into Account The Financial Security Of The Commune, The Ordering Party Decided Not To Divide The Contract Into Parts In Order To Prevent Potential Difficulties That May Arise In The Event Of Dividing The Contract Into Parts, Ultimately Resulting In The Inability To Benefit From Funding. Dividing The Contract Would Create A Risk In Which The Invalidation Of One Part Of The Procedure Would Jeopardize The Implementation Of The Entire Contract. Separating The Works Would Pose A Risk Of Organizational Problems That Could Not Be Eliminated. Dividing The Order Would Create A Risk That No Contractor Would Proceed With The Implementation Of A Small Part Of The Subject Of The Order. Dividing The Subject Of The Contract Into Tasks/Parts Would Pose A Risk Of A Signif