Tenders Are Invited For Reconstruction Of The Street Pilecki In Szczecinek - Stage 1

1. The Subject Of The Order Is The Performance Of The Following Scope Of Works In Accordance With The Design Documentation, Technical Specifications For The Execution And Acceptance Of Construction Works, Regulations, Including Technical And Construction Regulations, And The Principles Of Technical Knowledge And Construction Art: Execution And Commissioning Of The Investment Provided For In The Agreement Entitled Reconstruction Of Ul. Pilecki In Szczecinek - Stage I, On Plots No. 766, 534/1, 771, 535 Within 0013 Szczecinek And Removal Of Its Defects Found During The Performance Of Construction Works And During The Warranty Period For Physical Defects And Quality Guarantee, Which Will Be Able To Independently Fulfill An Economic Or Technical Function To The Extent Specified In: 1) The Construction/Technical/Executive Design, 2) Stwiorb,3) Bill Of Quantities.2.The Detailed Scope Of Works Referred To In Section 1, Is Specified In The Design Documentation And Technical Specifications For The Execution And Acceptance Of Construction Works, Constituting Annex No. 1 To Swz.3.The Bill Of Quantities Presented In The Specifications Of The Terms Of The Contract Are Only Informational Material And Do Not Constitute A Summary Of The Planned Works And All Expected Costs Related To The Execution Of The Subject Of The Contract. Works Not Included In The Bill Of Quantities But Occurring In Or Resulting From The Construction/Technical/Executive Design Are Not Additional Works. In The Event Of Discrepancies Between The Bill Of Quantities And The Construction/Technical/Executive Design, The Above-Mentioned Is Decisive For Determining The Scope Of Works. Design Documentation. The Contractor Cannot Demand Payment Of Additional Remuneration If, At The Stage Of Investment Implementation, It Turns Out That He Did Not Take Into Account The Elements Described In The Above-Mentioned. Design Documentation. 4. The Subject Of The Agreement Performed By The Contractor And Handed Over To The Ordering Party Will Be Fully Consistent With The Agreement And Will Meet The Needs For Which It Is Intended.5.Contractors May Submit An Equivalent Technical Proposal By Clearly Indicating In Their Offer, In A Separate Annex, The Changed Items, Then Providing All Information Necessary For A Complete Assessment Of The Equivalent Solution By The Ordering Party, As The Burden Of Demonstrating The Equivalence Of The Content Of The Submitted Offer Rests With The Contractor. The Trademarks, Patents Or Origins Used In The Design Documentation Are Examples And Are Intended Solely To Indicate The Quality Standard And Technical Parameters To Achieve The Expected Functionality Of The Entire System, Not Worse Than That Referred To In The Documentation.