Tenders Are Invited For Renovations Of Bituminous Road Surfaces In The Sulechów Commune - 2Nd Procedure

1.1.The Order Covers The Renovation Of Bituminous Road Surfaces In The Sulechów Commune, Including: 1) Partial Renovations Of The Road Surface With Saw Cutting, 2) Partial Renovations Of The Road Surface Without Saw Cutting, 3) Partial Renovations Of The Road Surface Using Cold Mass, 4) Partial Renovations Of The Road Surface Using A Recycler, 5) Leveling Of The Existing Subgrade With A Mineral-Bituminous Asphalt-Gravel Mixture, 6) Surface Milling Bituminous,7) Laying Surfaces Made Of Asphalt Mineral-Bituminous Mixtures (Wearing Layer), Thickness After Compaction Of 4 Cm, Grit Mass, Including Spraying,8) Eliminating Cracks And Burrs With Asphalt Emulsion And Grit, In Places Indicated Each Time By The Ordering Party, Assuming An Average, Approximate Thickness Of The Defect In The Road Of 4 Cm For The Renovations Described In Points 1-4 Above. 1.2.The Contractor Will Complete The Subject Of The Order Using Its Own Materials, Which It Will Purchase And Deliver To The Construction Site At Its Own Expense And Risk. The Cost Of Materials Used To Complete The Subject Of The Order Is Included In The Contractors Remuneration.1.3.The Contractor Is Obliged, Throughout The Entire Period Of Implementation Of The Subject Of The Order, To Employ Persons Performing Activities Related To The Implementation Of The Subject Of The Contract Referred To In Point. 1.1 Above, Solely On The Basis Of Employment Contracts Within The Meaning Of The Provisions Of The Act Of June 26, 1974, Labor Code.2.The Ordering Party Does Not Allow The Submission Of Variant And/Or Partial Offers.3.Reasons For Not Dividing The Contract Into Lots: Due To The Specific Nature Of The Subject Matter Of The Contract, Dividing The Contract Into Parts Would Be Irrational. It Could Cause Excessive Technical Difficulties And The Need To Coordinate The Activities Of Different Contractors Implementing Individual Parts Of The Contract, Which Could, In Consequence, Seriously Jeopardize The Proper Performance Of The Contract. This Would Result In An Increase In Unit Prices For Individual Types Of Work Due To Increased Costs On The Part Of The Contractor, In Particular Due To The Relatively High Costs Of Transporting Small Amounts Of Material From The Asphalt Mass Production Plant To The Place Of Construction And The Need To Transport Equipment To Carry Out Small Scopes Of Work. The Lack Of Division Of The Contract Into Parts Does Not Limit Competition.4.The Ordering Party Does Not Provide For The Possibility Of Awarding Single-Source Contracts Referred To In Art. 214 Section 1 Point 7 And 8 Of The Act. 5. The Ordering Party Will Not Select The Most Advantageous Offer Using An Electronic Auction.6.The Ordering Party Does Not Require Submitting An Offer In The Form Of Electronic Catalogs Or Attaching Electronic Catalogues.7.The Ordering Party Awards The Contract In Parts, Each Of Which Is The Subject Of A Separate Procedure.