Tenders Are Invited For Recreation And Rest Zone Puma Osiedle Robotnicze Ul. Fojkisa And Ul. E. Plater

1.1.The Subject Of The Order Is An Investment Task Entitled: Recreation And Recreation Zone Puma Osiedle Robotnicze Ul. Fojkisa And Ul. E. Plater. The Task Is Carried Out In The Design And Build Mode.1.2.The Scope Of The Planned Order Includes: A) Preparation Of Design Documentation Along With The Necessary Arrangements, B) Construction Of 1.5 M Wide Paved Alleys - Approx. 185 M (278 M2), C) Construction Of A Circular Flower Bed (Approx. 13 M2) With Paving Of The Surrounding Space (Approx. 37 M2), D) Planting Of Multi-Season Plants Inside The New Flower Bed, E) Installation Of Small Architecture Elements: • Urban Furniture (2 Deckchairs And 1 Hammock) – 3 Pcs., • Benches With Backrests – 8 Pcs., • Waste Bins – 9 Pcs., • Dog Waste Bins – 4 Pcs. F) Installation Of Hybrid Solar-Wind Led Lamps – 2 Pcs. G) Disassembly Of Existing Steel Gates – 2 Pcs. 1.3. A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Order Includes: A) Functional And Utility Program (Appendix No. 3 To The Swz), B) Designed Provisions Of The Contract (Appendix No. 4 To The Swz). - Hereinafter Collectively Referred To As The Documentation.2.The Selected Contractor Will Provide The Ordering Party With A Guarantee And Warranty For The Subject Of The Order For A Period Consistent With The Contractors Offer, But Not Shorter Than 60 Months, Counting From The Day Following The Day Of The Official Acceptance Without Any Reservations Of The Entire Subject Of The Order.3.The Ordering Party Described The Subject Of The Contract Without Indicating Trademarks, Patents Or Origin, Source Or Specific Process That Characterizes The Product Or Services Provided By A Specific Contractor. If The Contractor Finds That The Subject Of The Order Has Been Described In The Manner Referred To In Article 99(5) Of The Act, I.E. The Origin (Brand, Trademark, Manufacturer, Supplier) Of The Materials Has Been Indicated, But The Criteria Used To Assess Equivalence Have Not Been Provided, He Should Ask The Ordering Party To Indicate What Criteria Will Be Used To Assess Equivalence.4.If The Documentation Constituting The Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Order Includes References To Standards, Technical Assessments, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference Systems Referred To In Art. 101 Section 1 Point 2 And Section 3 Of The Public Procurement Law, The Ordering Party Allows Solutions Equivalent To Those Described. The Use Of A Given Standard, Technical Assessment, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference System In The Documentation Is Only Intended To Clarify The Level Of The Ordering Partys Expectations In Relation To A Specific Material/Device/Product.5.In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order, The Ordering Party Took Into Account The Requirements Regarding Accessibility For Disabled People And Design For All Users Referred To In Art. 100 Paragraph 1 Pzp.6.In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order, The Ordering Party Did Not Specify The Performance Or Functionality Requirements Refe