Tenders Are Invited For Refuse And Waste Related Services – Provision Of Municipal Waste Management Services From Property Owners Located In The Bieruń Commune

Refuse And Waste Related Services – Provision Of Municipal Waste Management Services From Property Owners Located In The Bieruń Commune. 1. The Subject Of The Contract Is A Service Consisting In The Management Of Municipal Waste Generated In The Bieruń Commune: - On The Premises Of Real Estate Where Residents Live And Real Estate, Which Is Partly Real Estate Where Residents Live And Partly Real Estate Where No Residents Live, - On Real Estate Where There Is A Summer House Or Other Real Estate Used For Recreational And Leisure Purposes, - On Real Estate Where Inhabited By Residents And Municipal Waste Is Generated, - Waste Collected At Selective Municipal Waste Collection Points. The Estimated Amount Of Waste To Be Managed During The Order Implementation Period Was Determined On The Basis Of Data From Previous Years And Amounts To Approximately 9,040.18 Mg. 2. The Scope Of Services And Their Description Can Be Found In The Swz And In The Annexes To The Swz, I.E.: Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Contract (Opz), Draft Provisions Of The Contract, And The Calculation Form Template. 3. Pursuant To The Content Of Art. 95 Section 1 Of The Public Procurement Law, The Ordering Party Informs That It Sets Requirements Regarding The Employment Of The Contractor Or Subcontractor On The Basis Of The Employment Relationship Of Persons Performing Activities In The Scope Of The Contract Consisting In Performing Work In The Manner Specified In Art. 22 § 1 Of The Act Of June 26, 1974 - Labor Code (Consolidated Text: Journal Of Laws Of 2023, Item 1465, As Amended). Details Regarding The Above-Mentioned Requirements, The Method Of Employment Verification And The Ordering Partys Control Rights Are Included In The Draft Provisions Of The Contract, Which Constitute An Annex To The Swz. 4. The Order Is Not Covered By Financial Support. 5. The Ordering Party Does Not Allow The Possibility Of Submitting A Variant Offer. 6. The Ordering Party Does Not Allow The Possibility Of Submitting Partial Offers Under The Subject Order. In The Ordering Partys Opinion, The Lack Of Division Of The Order Into Parts Does Not Limit The Possibility Of Participation Of Contractors Of Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises In Terms Of Quantity And Quality. Moreover, The Decision On Dividing The Contract Into Parts Is The Responsibility Of The Ordering Party, In Accordance With The Public Procurement Act And The Provisions Therein Stipulating The Obligation For Ordering Parties To Divide The Contract Into Parts. However, Art. 91 Section 1 Pzp Should Be Interpreted Together With Art. 91 Section 2 Of The Public Procurement Law In Order To Examine Whether The Reasons For Not Dividing The Contract Violate The Rules Of Conduct Expressed In Art. 16 Point 1 Of The Public Procurement Law. The Lack Of Division Of The Contract Into Parts Does Not In Any Way Limit The Principle Of Fair Competition. The Provision Of Art. 91 Section 1 Of The Ppl Indicates That The Ordering Party May Award The Contract In Parts - Therefore It Does Not Constitute A Source Of Obligation For The Ordering Party And On Its Basis No Objection Can Be Made Against The Ordering Party Who Does Not Make Such A Division. However, Art. 91 Section 2 Of The Pzp Creates An Obligation To Include Justification In The Procedure Documents In The Event Of Failure To Divide The Contract. Yes