Request For Information - Image And Media Data Management System (Dam)

The City Of Turku Is Preparing The Purchase Of An Image And Media Management System (Dam). The New Platform To Be Procured Is Part Of The Citys Digital Material Management (Dam) Solution, The Goal Of Which Is To Increase Productivity And The Value Of Digital Resources By Making Their Organization, Availability, Use And Distribution Easy. The Procurement Aims To: • Develop The Management, Mobility And Usability Of Materials • Improve The Flow Of Communication Between The Various Units Of The City Of Turku And External Partners • Replace The Current Systems, Image And Material Bank (M-Files) And The Public Media Bank (Imagebank X) The Goal Is To Have A System Where All Material Is Centralized In One Place With One Login.Request For Information With This Request For Information, The City Of Turku Is Asking Market Players For Their Views And Feedback On The Attached Preliminary Procurement Documents. The Goal Is To Ensure That The Documents Are Clear, Appropriate And Realistic In Terms Of The Market Situation Before Starting The Actual Bidding Process. The City Of Turku Asks Suppliers To Give Feedback Openly, Honestly And As Concretely As Possible. Feedback Based On Practical Examples Is Particularly Useful. We Ask You To Highlight, For Example, Points That Are Unclear, Difficult To Interpret, Technically Challenging, Deviate From Market Practice Or May Unnecessarily Limit Competition. Alternative Proposals And Clarifications Are Also Welcome. We Ask For Comments On The Purpose Of The Procurement, Requirements, Comparison Criteria And Their Feasibility. Key Questions:1. Mandatory Requirements Name The Minimum Requirements That You Cannot Meet Or That Require Substantial Product Development, Deviating Licensing Or Implementation Deviating From Market Practice. In These Points You Can Also Describe An Alternative Functional Implementation Method. 2. Integrated In The Upcoming Tender Request, We Ask For A Description And A Comparative Price For The Implementation Of Drupal And Wordpress Integrations In Accordance With The Requirements Specification. Question For The Request For Information: Describe How / With Which Technologies / Following Which Standards The Drupal 11 Integration And Wordpress Integration According To The Appendix Would Be Implemented In The Solution You Offer. Specify Which Parts Are Ready, Which Require Configuration, And Which Customer-Specific Implementation. How Should The Implementation Of The Integration According To The Tender Request Be Priced So That The Total Price Of The Ready-To-Use Integration Is Comparable From The Customers Point Of View? 3. Price Comparison Incl. Implementation Of Integrations - Implementation Of Drupal/Wordpress Integration (Ready-Made, Configurable And Customer-Specific Parts) - Implementation Project - 48 Months Service Fees - Expert Work 10 Htp (Person Labor Days), I.E. 75 Hours Question: Does The Structure Produce Comparable Prices From The Suppliers Point Of View? 4. Log Management And Information Security Which Log Management, Information Security, Auditing Or Service Level Requirements Differ From Your Usual Saas Service Delivery Model, Are Difficult To Fulfill Or Substantially Increase The Price Of The Service? We Ask You To Identify The Requirement, The Effect And A Possible Alternative Method Of Implementation. 5. Verification Of Yes/No Quality Scores What Kind Of Consistent Evidence Would It Be Reasonable To Require From The Provider To Support A Yes Answer, For Example A Description, Product Documentation, Screenshot, Video Or Demo, So That The Verification Of The Features To Be Scored Would Be Fair Without An Interpretation-Dependent Quality Assessment? 6. Assessing The Quality Of The Commissioning Project How Would You Evaluate The Quality Of The Commissioning Project In A Comparable Way? Important Note About The Characteristics To Be Scored The Features To Be Scored Presented In The Appendices Are Not The Minimum Procurement Requirements Nor The Conditions For The Bidders Eligibility To Participate. The Tenderer Can Participate In The Competition, Even If Its Solution Does Not Meet All The Properties To Be Scored. The Features To Be Scored Only Affect The Mutual Quality Comparison Of The Offers. We Also Ask For Feedback On The Clarity, Appropriateness, Verifiability And Marketability Of The Features To Be Scored. If Any Feature Is Unrealistic From The Suppliers Point Of View, Open To Interpretation, Or Can Unnecessarily Restrict Competition, Please Describe The Issue As Concretely As Possible. Processing Of Responses Responses To The Request For Information Are Treated Confidentially. The Views, Comments Or Development Proposals Of Individual Companies Are Not Published And Are Not Publicly Linked To The Respondent. The Answers Will Only Be Used For The Evaluation And Possible Development Of The Procurement Documents Before The Tender Is Launched. This Notice Is A Request For Information. It Is Neither A Procurement Notice Nor A Request For Tender. Answering The Request For Information Does Not Bind The Respondent And Answering Is Not A Condition For Participation In A Possible Subsequent Competition. Based On The Answers, The Procurement Unit Can Contact The Responding Companies To Request Additional Information. This Announcement Is Not A Procurement Announcement Or A Request For Tender, But A Request For Information That Aims To Map The Market And Available Solutions. We Ask For Answers To The Questions In The Other Conditions Section.