Tenders Are Invited For Irrigation Equipment – ​​Delivery Of A Substrate Steamer To Ihar-Pib In Radzików

Irrigation Equipment – ​​Delivery Of A Substrate Steamer To Ihar-Pib In Radzików. 1. The Subject Of The Order Is The Delivery Of A Substrate Steamer To Ihar-Pib In Radzików. 2. A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Order Is Included In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order (Appendix No. 1 To The Swz). 3. The Procedure Is Conducted As An Open Tender, In Accordance With Art. 132 Of The Act Of 11 September 2019 Public Procurement Law (Consolidated Text: Journal Of Laws Of 2024, Item 1320, As Amended), Hereinafter Referred To As The Act Or Upzp, With An Estimated Value Equal To Or Exceeding The Eu Threshold Within The Meaning Of Art. 3 Of The Act. 4. The Ordering Party Did Not Divide The Order Into Parts And Therefore Does Not Allow The Submission Of Partial Offers. Justification: Dividing The Order Into Parts Is Impossible Because The Ordering Party Orders One Complete Device. At The Same Time, The Entire Order Is Tailored To The Needs Of Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises Within The Meaning Of Annex I To Commission Regulation (Eu) No. 651/2014 Of 17 June 2014. 5. If, When Describing The Subject Of The Order, The Ordering Party Refers To Standards, Technical Assessments, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference Systems Referred To In Art. 101 Section 2 And Section 3 Of The Public Procurement Law, Solutions Equivalent To Those Described Are Allowed. Each Phrase Relating To Standards, Technical Assessments, Technical Specifications And The Technical Reference System Included In The Swz Should Be Read With An Accompanying Note Or Equivalent. 6. If Trademarks, Patents Or Origins Appear In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order, They Should Be Understood In Accordance With Art. 99 Section 5-6 Of The Public Procurement Law, That It Is Justified By The Specificity Of The Subject Of The Contract And The Ordering Party Cannot Describe The Subject Of The Contract Using Sufficiently Precise Terms. In Such Circumstances, The Ordering Party Allows The Possibility Of Submitting Equivalent Solutions In The Offer, Indicating That The Minimum Requirements To Be Met By Equivalent Solutions Are Requirements (Functionalities) Not Worse Than The Parameters (Functionalities) Indicated In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order. 7. The Contractor Who Refers To Solutions Equivalent To Those Described By The Ordering Party Is Obliged To Indicate In The Offer Which Items Of The Offer Contain Equivalent Solutions Along With Their Description Or Standards And To Demonstrate That The Equivalent Solutions He Offers Meet The Requirements Specified By The Ordering Party, In Particular By Means Of Evidence. 8. The Ordering Party Does Not Allow The Submission Of Variant Offers. 9. The Ordering Party Does Not Envisage Concluding A Framework Agreement. 10. The Ordering Party Does Not Plan To Select The Offer Using An Electronic Auction. 11. The Ordering Party Does Not Provide For Reimbursement Of The Costs Of Participation In The Proceedings, Subject To Art. 261 Upzp. 12. The Ordering Party Does Not Provide For The Requirements Referred To In Art. 96 Section 1 Upzp. 13. The Ordering Party Does Not Allow Submitting Offers In The Form Of Electronic Catalogs Or Attaching Electronic Catalogs To The Offer. 14. The Ordering Party Does Not Envisage The Possibility Of Awarding Contracts Referred To In Art. 214 Section