It Services: Consulting, Software Development, Internet And Support – Los 2 - Sap Hcm-Transformation. The Subject Of The Procurement Is The Modernization Of The Hr System Landscape Of The Essen University Hospital By Migrating From Sap Hcm To H4s4 And/Or Sap Successfactors. The Scope Of Services Includes Conception, System Configuration, Data Migration, Integration Into The Existing System Landscape, Change Management And Training Up To Go-Live (Including Hypercare) As Well As Optional Support In The Further Development Phase. Further Details Can Be Found In The Service Description. Due To Technical Limitations, The Award Criteria Are Presented Below: 1. Price 30% 300 Points. 2. Implementation Concept 30% 300 Points. 3. Offer Presentation And Case Study 20% 200 Points. 4. Project Team 20% 200 Points. The Contract Will Be Awarded To The Bidder Whose Offer Is The Most Economical According To The Above Criteria. As Part Of The Price Award Criterion, The Bidder Receives The Maximum Performance Score Whose Information Represents The Best Value For The Client; The Remaining Bidders Receive Points According To The Method Described, Which Represent The Ratio Of Their Information To The Best Information. For The Other Evaluation Criteria, The Evaluation Is Generally Also Relative. However, If It Is Absolute In Some Parts, The Offers Will Be Evaluated According To The Extent To Which, In The Awarding Authoritys Assessment, Based On The Offers, They Can Be Expected To Provide Professional Performance Of The Services In The Advertised Quality And A Smooth Process Of Measures. The Best Bidder Does Not Necessarily Have To Receive The Maximum Possible Evaluation/Performance Score For The Criterion. In Particular, There Is No Extrapolation Of The Credit Points For These Evaluation Criteria. The Client Also Considers This Evaluation Method To Be Permissible In Light Of The Decision Of The Schleswig-Holstein Higher Regional Court (Decision Of July 2, 2010, 1 Verg 1/10). The Evaluation Criteria Give The Client Scope For Assessment, Which They Will Use To The Best Of Their Knowledge And Belief In An Impartial, Transparent And Non-Discriminatory Manner. The Client Considers The Selected Evaluation Criteria, Their Description (Including Requirements For The Content Of The Offers), The Associated Information On The Evaluation Standard And The Evaluation Method To Be Compliant With Public Procurement Law. The Client Has Presented The Evaluation Criteria And His Evaluation Standards As Transparently As Possible To The Best Of His Knowledge And Belief, Taking Into Account The Current Highest Court Case Law (Bgh, Decision Of April 4, 2017 - X Zb 3/17). The Ecj Stated In The Tns Dimarso Case (Judgment Of July 14, 2016 - C-6/15, Tns Dimarso) That The Client Is Not Obliged To Inform Potential Bidders Of The Detailed Evaluation Methodology In Advance. However, This Must Not Lead To A (Subsequent) Change To The Award Criteria Or Their Weighting. The Bidders
We takes all possible care for accurate & authentic tender information, however Users are requested to refer Original source of Tender Notice / Tender Document published by Tender Issuing Agency before taking any call regarding this tender.
