Tenders Are Invited For Architectural, Engineering And Planning Services - Expansion And Energy-Efficient Renovation - Tk Education Center In Salzhausen - Non-Open, Single-Phase, Structural Realization Competition In Accordance With Rpw 2013 With Subsequent Negotiation Process.

Architectural, Engineering And Planning Services - Expansion And Energy-Efficient Renovation - Tk Education Center In Salzhausen - Non-Open, Single-Phase, Structural Realization Competition In Accordance With Rpw 2013 With Subsequent Negotiation Process.. Assessment Criteria For The Competition: - Urban Development Concept - Structural Concept - Functional Concept The Order Presented Does Not Imply Any Evaluation Or Weighting Of The Individual Criteria Against Or Among Each Other. The Jury Gives A Written Recommendation For The Further Development And Processing Of The Task In Accordance With Section 6 Para. 2 Rpw 2013. The Organizer Declares That, In Consideration Of The Recommendations Of The Jury And In Accordance With Section 8 Para. Hoai Will Commission At Least Service Phase 3 (And, If Necessary, Rework Of Service Phases 1 And 2 - See Term Sheet). The Sponsor Expressly Aims To Commission The Further Service Phases Up To And Including Service Phase 8 Of The Hoai. The Further Service Phases Are Commissioned In Stages (See Term Sheet). The Commission Is Made Provided That The Project Is Implemented And There Is No Important Reason Preventing The Commission (This Includes, For Example, Non-Agreement Upon Conclusion Of The Contract And Securing Financing). The Sponsor Reserves The Right To Outsource The Execution Of The Construction Work (In Whole Or In Part, If Necessary) To A General Contractor (Gu) As The Project Progresses. In This Case, It Might Be Possible For The Architect Commissioned To Be Commissioned To Provide The Quality Assurance Services Of Service Phase 5 Instead Of The Complete Service Phase 5. In The Event Of Further Processing, Basic Services Already Provided By The Author As A Result Of The Procedure Will Not Be Remunerated Again Up To The Amount Of The Prize Awarded If The Draft Is Used Unchanged In Its Essential Parts For Further Processing. If A Planning Team Dissolves After The Award Ceremony, The Organizer Is Entitled To Commission One Or More Members Of The Planning Team With The Planning Task On Which The Procedure Is Based. If It Turns Out That A Planning Team In The Young Offices Category Has Selected The Winners, The Organizer Reserves The Right To Demand Collaboration With An Experienced Architectural Firm. When Choosing This Office, The Sponsors Consent Is Required. The Prize Winner Is Entitled To Act As A Bidder Or Bidding Consortium Or As A Subcontractor In The Subsequent Negotiation Phase With The Experienced Architectural Firm. Together With The Experienced Architectural Firm, The Minimum Requirements For Offices With Construction Experience Stated In The Announcement Must Be Met. Subsequent Negotiation Process: The Organizer Initially Only Carries Out Negotiations With The Planning Team That Was Awarded First Prize. Only In The Event That The 1St Prize Winner Does Not Submit An Offer Or Negotiate