Tenders are invited for Volunteer Position - Independent Advisory Panel Members Closing Date: 27 Mar 2026 Type: Consultancy The World Coalition Against the Death Penalty (World Coalition), an alliance of more than 190 NGOs, bar associations, local authorities and unions, aims to strengthen the international dimension of the fight against the death penalty. Its objective is to obtain the universal abolition of the death penalty. In line with its 2023-2027 Strategic Plan, it aims to do so by: Coordinating international advocacy Sharing information, contact and solidarity Building best practices Leading global campaigns and supporting and amplifying national campaigns Promoting good governance and power sharing Funding campaigns and actions for the abolition of the death penalty 1) World Coalition Structure and Governance The World Coalition is a membership-based international network of over 180 independent member organizations which meet for a General Assembly every two years and elect a Steering Committee of 25 member organizations, which elects among its members an Executive Board of 5 people, which supervises a Secretariat made up of 5 salaried staff and 1 or 2 interns. As part of its strategy, and in the context of a Financial Framework Partnership Agreement (FFPA) signed with the European Union that establishes a Global Consortium for Death Penalty Abolition (the Consortium), the World Coalition has created a body: an Independent Advisory Panel. 2) Consortium Structure and Governance The Consortium is made of twelve member organizations of the World Coalition: Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network (ADPAN), Comunità di SantEgidio, Ensemble contre la peine de mort (ECPM), International Federation of ACATs (FIACAT), Greater Caribbean for Life (GCL), Harm Reduction International (HRI), Parliamentarians for Global Action (PGA), Penal Reform International (PRI), Reprieve, The Death Penalty Project, The Rights Practice and Witness to Innocence (WTI). It is coordinated by the World Coalition and structured with a Consortium Board, made of representatives of each Consortium member. 3) The Independent Advisory Panel The Independent Advisory Panel (the Panel) will: comprise independent experts (See para. 6 for a definition of independent experts) operating outside of and independent from the organizations constituting the Consortium, who are representative of all geographic regions. be nominated by a subcommittee (see para. 4 for selection process) from a pool of candidates identified after the circulation of a call for Independent Advisory Panel members. contribute expert independent opinions in respect of regranting funds by the Consortium to Consortium members, affiliated entities, contractors and third parties. Each Panel member will assess proposals for regrants based on the strategic objectives of the FFPA and its expertise and knowledge of the region and/or anti-death penalty work. In assessing proposals, Panel members shall consider alignment with the FFPA strategic objectives, and shall be guided by a needs-based approach, giving particular attention to proposals originating from under-resourced contexts, including retentionist and high-burden countries, as well as countries at risk of regression or reinstatement of the death penalty, and to initiatives that strengthen locally led abolition efforts in environments where advocacy entails heightened legal, political, or security risks. The Panel recommendations will inform the Second and the preparation of the third grant application to the European Union in the framework of the FFPA in 2027.. make recommendations for the final activities and budget of the Third grant application, if the Consortium Board cant find an agreement. review regranting processes and projects on a yearly basis to ensure they are effective and provide recommendations to the Consortium Board. give expert advice on any potential conflicts of interest amongst Consortium Members in respect of regrants and contracts, including for work in countries where more than one Consortium Member works or wishes to work. contribute to transparency, accountability, and learning within the abolitionist movement by engaging, subject to confidentiality safeguards, in structured feedback exchanges with applicants, including opportunities for clarification and dialogue where appropriate, and by identifying recommendations emerging from the regranting process to inform future funding rounds and strengthen organizational capacity. be made of volunteers who will not be remunerated for their service on the Panel, only costs for virtual and face-to-face meetings shall be covered by the Consortium budget. 4) Panel Composition and Selection The Panel consists of up to ten members and two additional reserve members. Reserve members are people who can be called upon if Panel members have to recuse themselves due to conflict of interest or have to step down for other reasons. Panel members will be nominated through this open call for nominations, which is circulated by the Secretariat of the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty to all its members and other external networks. The nominations will be reviewed by a subcommittee of at least three (3) members of the World Coalitions Steering Committee. The Steering Committee will decide on a final list of Panel members. The selection process for Panel members will comply with the following principles to ensure that the Panel members will: Be able and willing to review and score grant proposals objectively, discuss them, and offer perspectives about how international funding can support activities and organizational capacities of global and regional civil society and anti-death penalty movements. Demonstrate expertise related to advocating against the death penalty and one or more areas including campaigning, researching, governance, experience working with people facing the death penalty, and working with abolitionist civil society. Have experience with or have been exposed to grant making and/or technical assistance, and have familiarity with program development, implementation and evaluation. Reflect gender and geographical balance. At least one of the members has been directly impacted by the death penalty (exoneree, family member of a person sentenced to death, murder victim family member opposed to the death penalty, capital defense lawyer, ). Evaluate proposals in light of the objectives of the World Coalition and the Consortium, as defined in its 2023-2027 strategic plan, demonstrating objectivity and impartiality, without any bias related to any personal considerations related to their experience and expertise in particular. 5) Operating Procedures of the Panel The term of membership on the Panel is two years. For the sake of effectiveness and continuity, at the end of the first two-year mandate, at least one third of the Panel members will be asked to continue to serve a second term. With the view of staggering and ensuring rotation and continuity, Panel Membership cannot exceed 2 terms. Diversity of members should be guaranteed during the rotation procedure. In total, each Panel member is expected to be available: during a Request for Proposals phase, for at least 6 days in reading, reviewing, and scoring proposals (maximum once a year, minimum every other year); at least 1 day for online meetings with other Panel members to discuss and finalize reviews (maximum once a year, minimum every other year); at least 1 day for online meetings from one to three additional videoconferences yearly to discuss grant making recommendations and processes; at least 2 days for an in-person meeting once every other year. at least once a year to discuss and propose a resolution to one or more conflicts. The Panel review process is a peer-based collective review process. To avoid conflict of interest, each grant application will be reviewed by two Panel members in writing, provided that enough Panel members are available for the number of proposals to be evaluated. The same evaluation grid will be used by all Panel members. Panel Members may request more information from the Secretariat of the World Coalition, acting as the coordinator, at any point. During the online meeting of the Panel members to make their recommendations, grant applications will be discussed with all Panel Members and the Chatham House Rule will apply to deliberations, including the non-attribution of individual views. This confidentiality shall not extend to the communication of final recommendations or structured feedback to applicants, subject to appropriate safeguards concerning sensitive information and third-party confidentiality. The recommendations of the Panel will then be submitted in writing to the Consortium Board, which will inform the Panel about the final decision. To prevent potential conflict of interest, all Panel members will be asked to disclose any link to other organizations and institutions: To the selection subcommittee, if they are pre-selected. To other Panel members before each consideration of application. Panel members act in their personal capacity and shall not seek or receive instructions from any government, donor, Consortium member, applicant, or other external actor. In carrying out their functions, Panel members shall adhere to the principle of do no harm, ensuring that their assessments, communications, and feedback do not expose applicants or beneficiaries to legal, political, security, or reputational risks. 6) Who should apply to be a member of the Independent Advisory Panel? The World Coalition is seeking Panel members who are experts. Panel members are volunteers and are selected for their experience with grant making and technical assistance, so as to provide the Consortium with strong advice about allocation of resources, non-duplication of resources, context Tender Link : https://reliefweb.int/job/4202414/volunteer-position-independent-advisory-panel-members
