Request For Information, Overall Assessment Of The Current State Of Physical Education In Finland

The Ministry Of Education And Culture (Okm) Is Preparing The Acquisition Of A Comprehensive Assessment Of The Current State Of Physical Education Research In Finland. The Purpose Of This Information Request Is To Clarify Questions And Price Estimates Related To The Implementation Of The Evaluation. The Goal Is To Get Comprehensive Information About The Procurement, So That A Possible Tender Can Be Carried Out In The Most Expedient Way Possible. This Document Is Not A Procurement Announcement Or A Request For Tender, But A Market Survey, I.E. A Request For Information. The Procurement Unit Does Not Undertake To Carry Out The Procurement. Decisions On Starting A Possible Procurement Process Are Made After The Market Survey. Objective Of Procurement: The Goal Of The Ministry Of Education And Culture, The State Sports Council, Is To Acquire An Evaluation That Produces An Overall Picture Of The Current Status, Position, Focus, Actors, Prerequisites, Strengths, Development Areas And Opportunities Of Finnish Sports Research. In Addition, The Development Of Exercise Research In Finland Since The Previous Overall Assessment Of Exercise Research In The Early 2010S And The Situation In Comparison Countries Are Evaluated. The Evaluation Also Produces Development Recommendations For The Development Of Exercise Research In Finland. The Evaluation Uses Previous Studies, Evaluations, Reports And Other Reports, Statistical And Bibliometric Reviews As Well As New Materials Collected During The Work, Such As Interviews And Surveys. The Evaluation Consists Of The Following Areas: 1) The Situation And Development Of Finnish Sports Research • System • Scope And Targeting • Strategic And Planned • Research Infrastructure And Science Communication • Resources • Cooperation • Competence • Level, Quality And Effectiveness In Addition To The Previous Areas And Preliminary Evaluation Questions (Described In Appendix 1), The Following Will Also Be Evaluated. The Situation Of Finnish Exercise Research In Relation To Key Reference Countries (At Least In Terms Of Exercise Research Research Infrastructure And Research Scope, Level And Resources). B. Implementation Of The Recommendations Of The Previous Nordic Assessment Of Exercise Research (2012). 2) Conclusions And Development Recommendations The Preliminary Evaluation Questions And Other More Detailed Information About The Evaluation Are Described In Appendix 1 Of The Request For Information, Which Can Be Found In The Tender Service. What Would Be The Best Way To Implement The Project? You Can Present Your Views On The Projects Implementation Options And Phases. 2. Would You Be Initially Interested In Offering The Entire Evaluation Project Or Alternatively Some Sub-Assemblies? Do You See That The Project Could Be Implemented As A Whole By Your Organization Or In Cooperation With Other Organizations As A Group Or Using Subcontracting? 3. Are The Content, Goals, Components And Preliminary Evaluation Questions Of The Overall Evaluation To Be Implemented Clearly Described In The Evaluation Plan In Appendix 1? If Not, What Should Be Specified? 4. Initially, A Fixed Total Price For The Implementation Of The Evaluation Has Been Considered. Has The Content Of The Project Been Described At A Sufficient Level In The Description Of The Subject Of The Evaluation So That You Could Give A Total Price For The Implementation? Would Another Pricing Model Be Appropriate? 5. What Is Your Preliminary Price Estimate For The Implementation Of The Project? 6. The Preliminary Schedule Of The Project Is Described In Appendix 1. Do You Think The Preliminary Schedule Is Realistic? What Is Your Assessment Of The Schedule Needed For The Implementation Of The Project And The Personnel Working Days Used? Does The Schedule Have Pricing Implications? If So, What Kind? 7. Describe Your Companys Experience In Providing Similar Services. We Ask You To Indicate What Kind Of References You Have For Providing A Service Corresponding To The Object Of The Procurement. 8. Appendix 2 Competence And Experience Of Experts •What Do You Think About The Minimum Requirements Of Experts And The Experience To Be Scored? Are The Experts Minimum Requirements And Scoring Criteria Described Sufficiently Clearly And Unambiguously? Should The Requirements Be Specified? •Do You Have Experts Who Can Find Suitable Expertise For The Implementation Of This Assessment? What Kind Of Skills Do They Have? •Do You Think The Number Of Experts Tentatively Planned In Appendix 2 Is Sufficient For The Implementation Of The Evaluation? If Not, How Many Experts Would Be Needed And In What Roles To Carry Out The Evaluation? • Do You Have Any Other Comments Regarding Appendix 2? In Addition To This Information, We Are Asking For Your Free-Form Views On Issues That Should Be Taken Into Account When Making A Request For Tender. Answers Should Be Sent By Email To [email protected]. In The Subject Field Of The Message, Write Vn/4528/2026 Response To The Request For Information And The Name Of Your Company. Note! If Your Answer Contains Business And Professional Secrets Or Other Confidential Information, We Ask That You Clearly Identify And Mark The Aforementioned Information. Okm Reserves The Opportunity To Send Procurement-Related Material By E-Mail To Bidders Who Have Registered For The Market Dialogue For Comment And Follow-Up Questions Related To The Preparation. Answering The Request For Information Does Not Obligate The Supplier To Participate In A Tender That May Be Organized Later, And Is Not A Prerequisite For Participation In The Tender Or The Position Of An Influencer In The Actual Tender. In The Tender.