Tenders Are Invited For Construction Of The Municipal Road Ul. Wierzbowa In Gogolin

The Subject Of The Order Is The Construction Of The Municipal Road Ul. Wierzbowa In Gogolin. The Contract Envisages, In Particular, The Following Scope Of Work: Preparatory And Demolition Works, Construction Of The Road Structure, Curbs/Retainers, Roadsides, Plantings, Pedestrian And Bicycle Path/Height Regulation, Exits, Linear Drainage, Target Markings, Well Regulation, Securing The Existing Underground Network, Road Lighting. A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Contract And The Scope Of Works Are Specified In The Design Documentation, Bill Of Quantities And Technical Specification For The Execution And Acceptance Of Construction Works. (Stwiorb), Which Constitute Appendices To This Swz. All References To Standards In The Technical Documentation And The Devices And Materials Indicated By Name Should Be Understood As Specifying The Required Technical Parameters Or Quality Standards. This Means That In The Case Of The Materials (Products) Indicated By Name, The Ordering Party Allows The Use Of Equivalent Materials, Of No Lower Quality Than Those Described In The Design Documentation. The Concept Of Equivalent Materials And Devices Should Be Understood As Materials Guaranteeing The Implementation Of Works In Accordance With The Design And Ensuring The Achievement Of Technical Parameters Not Worse Than Those Assumed In The Design Documentation, Technical Specification For The Execution And Acceptance Of Works And The Bill Of Quantities. Equivalent Products And Devices Must Be Admitted To Trading And Use In Accordance With Applicable Law. The Ordering Party Indicates That The Obligation To Submit In The Offer Solutions Equivalent To Those Described In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order And To Demonstrate Equivalence Lies With The Contractor. Reasons For Not Dividing The Order Into Parts: Dividing The Order Into Parts Is Pointless. Such A Division Of The Contract Into Parts Would Pose A Risk Of Excessive Technical Difficulties And Excessive Costs Of Contract Execution. Coordination Of The Activities Of Different Contractors Implementing Individual Parts Of The Contract Could Seriously Jeopardize The Proper Performance Of The Contract. Another Important Reason For Not Dividing The Order Into Parts Is That The Ordering Party Obtains A Quality Guarantee For The Entire Order; After Dividing It Into Parts, It Would Be Difficult To Obtain Such A Guarantee And There Would Be Excessive Fragmentation Of Responsibility Among Different Contractors And Would Pose A Threat To Pursuing Claims Under The Guarantee Or Warranty. Due To The Scope Of Work To Be Performed, Which Are Closely Interconnected And Dependent, Division Into Parts Could Cause Problems With The Timely Completion Of Individual Parts And The Entire Order. Micro, Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises Can Freely Apply For The Order, Subcontracting Is Also Allowed, So There Is Absolutely No Question Of Distorting Competition By Limiting The Ability Of Smaller Entities To Apply For The O