1. The Subject Of The Order Is The Performance Of Construction Works Within The Meaning Of The Act Of July 7, 1994 - Construction Law As Part Of The Task Entitled: ” “Construction Of A Sanitary Sewage System In The Town Of Pszenicza.” The Task Is Carried Out As Part Of The National Recovery And Resilience Plan (Kpo). Investment: B3.1.1 Investments In Sustainable Water And Sewage Management In Rural Areas. Component B Green Energy And Reducing Energy Consumption. Specific Objective: B3. Adaptation To Climate Change And Limiting Environmental Degradation. Reform: B3.1. Support For Sustainable Water And Sewage Management In Rural Areas. Scope Of Work: - Construction Of A Gravity Sanitary Sewage Network - Construction Of A Pressure Sanitary Sewage Network - Reconstruction Of The Surface A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Order Is Attached As Annex No. 3 To Swz.3. The Contractor Is Obliged To Complete The Order On The Terms And Conditions Described In The Swz Together With Annexes And The Offer.4. The Ordering Party Does Not Divide The Order Into Parts. The Value Of The Order Is Lower Than The So-Called Eu Thresholds That Oblige To Implement Eu Directives. Directive 2014/24/Eu States In Recital 78 That, In Order To Increase Competition, Contracting Authorities Should In Particular Be Encouraged To Divide Large Contracts Into Lots. The Contract In Question Is Not A Large Contract Within The Meaning Of Recital 78 Of The Above-Mentioned Eu Directive (The Directives Apply From The So-Called Eu Thresholds, And The Directive Uses The Concept Of A Large Contract In The Context Of Contracts Subject To The Directive, I.E. A Contract With A Value Significantly Exceeding The So-Called Eu Thresholds). Taking Into Account The Financial Security Of The Commune, The Ordering Party Decided Not To Divide The Contract Into Parts In Order To Prevent Potential Difficulties That May Arise In The Event Of Dividing The Contract Into Parts, Ultimately Resulting In The Inability To Benefit From Funding. Dividing The Contract Would Create A Risk In Which The Invalidation Of One Part Of The Procedure Would Jeopardize The Implementation Of The Entire Contract. Separating The Works Would Pose A Risk Of Organizational Problems That Could Not Be Eliminated. Dividing The Order Would Create A Risk That No Contractor Would Proceed With The Implementation Of A Small Part Of The Subject Of The Order. Dividing The Subject Of The Contract Into Tasks/Parts Would Result In A Significant Increase In Costs And Technological Difficulties Resulting From The Performance Of The Subject Of The Contract By A Larger Number Of Contractors (Individual Contractors Could Perform Work Using Different Technologies Allowed In The Documentation). In The Case Of This Investment Task Performed By Different Contractors, A Delay By One Of The Contractors Would Negatively Affect The Timely Completion Of The Task, Which Is Co-Financed And Must Be Settled Within A Very Short Time. The Ordering Party Coul
We takes all possible care for accurate & authentic tender information, however Users are requested to refer Original source of Tender Notice / Tender Document published by Tender Issuing Agency before taking any call regarding this tender.
