Tenders Are Invited For Reconstruction And Expansion Of A Multi-Functional Building With The Necessary Technical Infrastructure In The Town Of Gogolin As Part Of The Task: Construction Of A Brine Graduation Tower With The Necessary Infrastructure In The Town Of Gogolin

The Subject Of The Order Is The Reconstruction And Expansion Of A Multi-Functional Building With The Necessary Technical Infrastructure In The Town Of Gogolin As Part Of The Task: Construction Of A Brine Graduation Tower With The Necessary Technical Infrastructure In The Town Of Gogolin (The Second Stage Of The Green Cottage In The Park Ul. Ligonia). The Scope Of The Order Includes In Particular: Demolition Works, Earthworks, General Construction And Finishing Works, Assembly Works, Installation Works, I.E. Water, Sewage And Electrical. The Ordering Party Emphasizes That The Subject Of The Procedure Is Not The Construction Of A Brine Graduation Tower, Which Has Already Been Completed In 2023, But Is Included In The Design Documentation. A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Order And The Scope Of Works Are Specified In The Design Documentation, Bill Of Quantities And Technical Specification For The Execution And Acceptance Of Construction Works (Stwiorb), Which Constitute Appendices To This Swz. All References To Standards In The Technical Documentation And The Devices And Materials Indicated By The Name Should Be Understood As Specifying The Required Technical Parameters Or Quality Standards That In The Case Of The Materials (Products) Indicated By Name, The Ordering Party Allows The Use Of Equivalent Materials, Of No Lower Quality Than Those Described In The Design Documentation. The Concept Of Equivalent Materials And Devices Should Be Understood As Materials Guaranteeing The Implementation Of Works In Accordance With The Design And Ensuring That Technical Parameters Are Not Worse Than Those Assumed In The Design Documentation, Technical Specification For The Execution And Acceptance Of Works And The Bill Of Quantities. Offer Solutions Equivalent To Those Described In The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract And Demonstrating Equivalence Is The Responsibility Of The Contractor. Reasons For Not Dividing The Contract Into Parts: Dividing The Contract Into Parts Is Pointless. Such Division Of The Contract Into Parts Would Pose The Risk Of Excessive Technical Difficulties And Excessive Costs Of Contract Execution. Coordination Of Activities Of Different Contractors Implementing Individual Parts Of The Contract Could Seriously Jeopardize The Proper Performance Of The Contract. Problems With Obtaining Such A Guarantee And There Would Be Excessive Fragmentation Of Responsibility Among Various Contractors And Would Create A Risk Of Pursuing Claims Under The Guarantee Or Warranty. Due To The Scope Of Work To Be Performed, Which Are Closely Related And Dependent, Division Into Parts Could Cause Problems With The Timely Completion Of Individual Parts And The Entire Contract. Entities. The Value Of The Contract Is Lower Than The So-Called Eu Thresholds Which Oblige To Implement The Eu Directives (The Directive Applies From The So-Called Eu Thresholds, And In Order To Increase Competition, Contracting Authorities Should Be Particularly Encoura