Tenders Are Invited For Maintaining Horizontal And Vertical Markings In The City Of Siemianowice Śląskie.

1. The Subject Of The Order Is The Maintenance Of Horizontal And Vertical Signs In The City Of Siemianowice Śląskie In Accordance With Applicable Regulations And Road Safety Rules.2. The Scope Of Works Includes In Particular: - Performance Of Works In The Field Of Horizontal And Vertical Markings In Places Indicated By The Ordering Party; - Performance Of Intervention Works In The Field Of Horizontal And Vertical Markings In Places Indicated By The Ordering Party.3. The Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Order Is: A) Bill Of Quantities (Appendix No. 3 To The Swz), B) Technical Specifications For The Execution And Acceptance Of Construction Works (Appendix No. 4 To The Swz), C) Designed Contractual Provisions (Appendix No. 5 To The Swz), - Hereinafter Collectively Referred To As The Documentation.4. If The Dispatcher Of The Municipal Crisis Management Center (Mczk) Reports The Need To Mark The Places Of Threat (Dangerous Places), The Contractor Is Obliged, Within The Time Specified In The Offer, No Longer Than 50 Minutes, To: - Arrive At The Site And Report This Fact To The Mczk Dispatcher And Provide Information About The Existing Situation, - Immediately Perform And Report To The Mczk Dispatcher And The Ordering Party The Implementation Of The Security. 5. The Contractor Is Obliged To Complete The Order On The Terms And Conditions Described In The Draft Provisions Of The Contract (Appendix No. 5 To The Swz). 6. The Ordering Party Described The Subject Of The Order Without Indicating Trademarks, Patents Or Origin, Source Or Specific Process That Characterizes The Product Or Services Provided By A Specific Contractor. If The Contractor Finds That The Subject Of The Contract Has Been Described In The Manner Referred To In Art. 99 Section 5 Of The Act, I.E. The Origin (Brand, Trademark, Manufacturer, Supplier) Of The Materials Has Been Indicated And The Criteria Used To Assess Equivalence Have Not Been Provided, Should Ask The Ordering Party To Indicate What Criteria Will Be Used To Assess Equivalence.7. If The Documentation Constituting The Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Order Includes References To Standards, Technical Assessments, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference Systems Referred To In Art. 101 Section 1 Point 2 And Section 3 Of The Public Procurement Law, The Ordering Party Allows Solutions Equivalent To Those Described. The Use Of A Given Standard, Technical Assessment, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference System In The Documentation Is Only Intended To Clarify The Level Of The Ordering Partys Expectations In Relation To A Specific Material/Device/Product.8. In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order, The Ordering Party Took Into Account The Requirements Regarding Accessibility For Disabled People And Design For All Users Referred To In Art. 100 Section 1 Pzp.9. In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order, The Ordering Party Did Not Specify The Performance Or Functionality Requirements Refe