Tenders Are Invited For Mikkelin High School Water Roof Repair

The Subject Of The Repair Work Is Parts 1 And 2 Of The Water Roof Of The Mikkeli High School Building Located At Päämajankuja 4. The Original Part 1 Of The Building Is From 1949 And The Extension Part 2 From 1978. The Attic Spaces Of Extension Part 2 Were Changed To Warm In 1979. A New Iv Machine Room Was Built In The 1St And 2Nd Areas Of The Water Roof In 2010 A Riser Section That Is Delineated Away From The Repair Area. Part 1 Has A Brick Roof Built On Top Of The Original Felt Roof And Part 2 Has The Original Vartti Roof. The Repair Work Includes, Among Other Things, The Demolition Of The Old Water Roofs, The Demolition Of Decommissioned Iv Elevations, The Raising Of The Roof Structure To Improve Ventilation, The Renovation Of Skylights, The Addition Of Ei15 Partitions In The Upper Floor Cavities, And The Installation Of A New Machine-Seamed Sheet Metal Roof With Substructures. The Repair Work Must Be Carried Out Under A Weather Protection Canopy For At Least The Duration Of The Demolition Work And The Installation Of The Underlayment. The Contract Form Is A Total Contract, Where The Construction Contractor Acts As The Main Contractor Of The Project And As The Main Executor As Intended By The Legislation. The Contract Amount Is A Fixed Total Price. If The Bid Prices Are Equal, The City Uses A Lottery As The Selection Criterion. Site Information: Mikkeli High School, Päämajankuja 4, 50100 Mikkeli. Work Completion Date: Start Of Work 17.11.2025 Or When The Procurement Decision Is Legally Binding. Completion By February 28, 2026. Acquaintance With The Construction Site: The Developer Requires That The Contractor Has Familiarized Himself With The Work Site Before Making An Offer. Getting To Know The Destination Will Be Organized On Thursday 23 October 2025 At 14:00. Gathering In Front Of The Main Doors Of Mikkeli High School (Between The High School And The War And Peace Center Memory). At A Later Stage, The Contractor Loses The Right To Invoke Factors That Would Have Been Detectable By Carefully Examining The Site. The Customer Hopes That The Bidders Would Participate In The Joint Display. If The Provider Cannot Access The Joint Screening, The Screening Time Must Be Agreed Separately.