Tenders Are Invited For Solar Photovoltaic Modules - Słoneczna Commune - Installation Of Photovoltaic Installations In Public Infrastructure Iv - Primary School No. 5 Ul. Michałkowicka 15

Solar Photovoltaic Modules - Słoneczna Commune - Installation Of Photovoltaic Installations In Public Infrastructure Iv - Primary School No. 5 Ul. Michałkowicka 15. 1. The Subject Of The Order Is The Delivery And Installation Of Photovoltaic Installations At Primary School No. 15 In Siemianowice Śląskie. Installation With A Power Of 18.9 Kwp Located On The Ground On Plot No. 53-2394-12. The Area Around The Solar Installation Should Be Fenced With Fence Panels With A Foundation. 2. A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Are: A) Technical Report - Appendix No. 3 To Swz. B) Designed Contractual Provisions- Appendix No. 4 To Swz 3. The Contractor Is Obliged To Fulfill The Order On The Principles And Conditions Described In The Planned Provisions Of The Contract (Appendix No. 4 To Swz). 4. For The Subject Of The Contract, The Selected Contractor Will Grant The Contracting Authority A Guarantee And Warranty: A) To Photovoltaic Panels For A Period In Accordance With The Contractors Offer, However, Not Less Than 60 Months; B) On The Linear Output Power Of Solar Panels, I.E. Not Less Than 84% Of The Initial Efficiency After 25 Years Of Use, Warranty And Warranty For A Period Of 25 Years; C) For A Inverter For A Period Consistent With The Contractors Offer, However, Not Less Than 60 Months; D) The Remaining Scope Of The Subject Of The Contract Warranty And Warranty For A Period Of 72 Months; Counting From The Day After The Day Of Signing The Final Acceptance Report By The Ordering Party And The Contractor. 5. The Contracting Authority Described The Subject Of The Contract Without Indicating Trademarks, Patents Or Origin Of The Source Or A Special Process That Characterizes The Product Or Services Provided By A Specific Contractor. If The Contractor Finds That The Subject Of The Contract Was Described In The Manner Referred To In Art. 99 Para. 5 Of The Act, I.E. The Origin (Brand, Trademark, Manufacturer, Supplier) Of Materials Was Indicated, And The Criteria Used To Assess The Equivalence Were Not Given, He Should Ask The Employer To Indicate What Criteria Will Be Used To Assess Equivalence. If The Documentation Constituting The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Includes References To Standards, Technical Assessments, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference Systems Referred To In Art. 101, Para. 1, Point 2 And Para. 3 Of The Public Procurement Law, The Contracting Authority Allows Equivalent To The Described. The Use Of A Given Standard, Technical Assessment, Technical Specifications And Technical References In The Documentation Is Only Aimed At Clarifying The Level Of Expectations Of The Employer In Relation To A Specific Material/Device/Product. 6. The Purchaser Does Not Reserve The Possibility Of Applying For The Award Of The Contract Only By The Contractors Referred To In Art. 94 Of The Public Procurement Law Act, I.E. Having The Status Of A Sheltered Workshop, Social Cooperatives And Other Contractors Whose Main Purpose Or Main Purpose Of Their Organizationally Separated Units That Will Reality Will Be Released, Is The Social And Professional Integration Of Socially Marginalized People. 7. The Contracting Authority In The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Did Not Take Into Account The Requirements In The Scope Of Availability For Disabled People And Design For All