Tenders Are Invited For Delivery Of The Cinema Projection, Sound And Screen System

The Subject Of The Contract Is The Delivery Of A Cinema Projection System In Accordance With The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Constituting Annex 10 To This Swz. The Commissioning Is Financed From The Resources Of The State Film Institute, The Ministry Of Culture And National Heritage And From Its Own Resources. Equivalent To Resolutions: 1) In The Event That The Ordering Party Used In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order Of The Norm, Approval, Technical Specifications And Reference Systems Referred To Art. 101 Of The Public Procurement Law Should Be Understood As Examples. The Contracting Authority In Accordance With Art. 101 Para. 4 Of The Pzp Act, In Each Case Allows The Use Of Equivalent Solutions Described In The Content Of Swz. Each Time, When It Is Indicated In This Swz Or Attachments To Swz Norma, It Should Be Assumed That In Relation To It Used The Phrase Or Equivalent. All Places Of Swz And Attachments To Swz, In Which An Example Trademark, Patent, Origin, Source Or Special Process Was Used, Which Is Characterized By Products Or Services Provided By A Specific Contractor, Or If By Reference To Standards, Technical Assessments, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference Systems Referred To In Art. 101 Para. 1 Point 2) And Para. 3 Pzp, And In Each Case, Acting In Accordance With Art. 99 Para. 6 And Art. 101 Para. 4 Public Procurement Law, The Ordering Party Allows Equivalent Solutions Compared To The Swz Specified In Swz And In The Attachments To Swz, Indicating Such Indications Or Reference With The Words Or Equivalent Or Or Equivalent, Provided That Parameters Are Not Worse Than Those Specified In The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract. The Equivalent Solution Is Also Permissible In A Situation If The Equivalent Or Equivalent Word Was Not Included In The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract. The Communication Consists Of The Possibility Of Offering The Subject Of The Contract With No Worse Technical Parameters, Configurations, Normative, Functional Requirements, Etc. In The Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Contract, Some Of The Dimensions Characteristic Of The Manufacturer May Be Given. The Own Names Of The Manufacturers Of Materials And Devices Given In The Detailed Description Should Be Understood As The Preferred Type In Terms Of Determining The Minimum Quality Requirements. They Are Not Binding And You Can Provide Equivalent Elements That Have At Least The Same Or Better Standards, Technical Parameters; Qualitative, Functional, Will Be The Same And For The Same Purpose And Will Not Reduce The Standards Specified In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order. Set Products From Specific Manufacturers, Determine The Minimum Quality Parameters And The Utility Features That Goods Must Be Met To Meet The Requirements Set By The Contracting Authority And Are Only A Qualitative Model Of The Subject Of The Contract. By Recording The Minimum Quality Of Quality Parameters, The Employer Underst

Refer document

FileName	File Description
Global Tender Document	Tender Notice